Skip to main content

Dr Aidan Feeney's Full Publications List

Dr Aidan Feeney

Books

Feeney, A. & Heit, E. (Eds.). (2007). Inductive reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Journal Articles, Book Chapters and Commentaries

Feeney, A. & Handley, S.J. (in press). Suppositions, conditionals, and causal claims. To appear in C. Hoerl & T. McCormack (Eds.) Understanding Counterfactuals and Causation: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

McNair, S. & Feeney, A. (in press). Norms and high-level cognition: Consequences, trends and antidotes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Feeney, A. & Heit, E. (2011). Features of the diversity effect in category-based inductive reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 17, 156-181.

Feeney, A., Coley, J.D. & Crisp, A.K. (2010). The relevance framework for category-based induction: Evidence from garden path arguments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36, 906-916.

Feeney, A. & Crisp, A.K. (2010). A conjunction of fallacies: What different types of causal conjunction error reveal about dual processes for thinking. In K. Manktelow, D.E. Over & S. Elqayam (Eds.), The science of reason: A Festschrift for Jonathan St. B.T. Evans. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Crisp, A.K. & Feeney, A. (2009). Causal conjunction fallacies: The roles of causal strength and mental resources. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2320-2337.

Atkinson, L., Bell, D. & Feeney, A. (2009). The relationship between counterfactual thinking and emotional reactions to event outcomes: Does one account fit all? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 724-728.

Bonnefon, J.F., Feeney, A. & Villejoubert, G. (2009). When some is actually all: Scalar inferences in face-threatening contexts. Cognition, 112, 249-258.

Davison, I.M. & Feeney, A. (2008). Regret as autobiographical memory. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 385-403.

Feeney, A., Crisp, A.K. & Wilburn C.J. (2008). Inductive reasoning and semantic cognition: More than just different names for the same thing? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 715-716.

Feeney, A., Evans, J,St.B.T. & Venn, S. (2008). Rarity, pseudodiagnosticity and Bayesian reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 14, 209-230.

Feeney, A. & Wilburn, C.J. (2008). Deciding between theories of how reasoning develops is hard. Cognition, 108, 507-511.

Wilburn, C.J. & Feeney, A. (2008). Do development and learning really decrease memory? On similarity and category-based induction in adults and children. Cognition, 106, 1451-1464.

Feeney, A. (2007a). How many processes underlie category-based induction? Effects of conclusion specificity and cognitive ability. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1830-1839.

Feeney, A. (2007b). Individual differences, dual processes, and induction. In A. Feeney & E. Heit (Eds.), Inductive Reasoning (pp 302-327). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Feeney, A., Shafto, P. & Dunning, D. (2007). Who is susceptible to conjunction fallacies in category-based induction? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 884-889.

Handley, S.J. & Feeney, A. (2007a). Representation, pragmatics and process in model-based reasoning. In W. Schaeken, A. Vandierendonck, W. Schroyens, & G. d’Ydewalle (Eds.), The Mental Models theory of Reasoning: Refinement and Extensions (pp. 25-52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Handley, S.J. & Feeney, A. (2007b). Semi-factual: Byrne’s account of even-if. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 458-459.

Feeney, A. & Handley, S.J. (2006). Mental models, comparisons, and the action effect in judgements of regret. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1422-1430.

Feeney, A, Gardiner, R., Johnston, K., Jones, E. & McEvoy, R. (2005). Is regret for inaction relatively self-enhancing? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 761-777.

Heit, E. & Feeney, A. (2005). Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 340-344.

Heit, E., Hahn, U. & Feeney, A. Defending diversity. (2005). In W. Ahn, Goldstone, B.C., Love, A.B. & Wolff, P. (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside of the lab: Festscrift in Honor of Douglas L. Medin (pp. 87-100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Handley, S.J. & Feeney, A. (2004). Reasoning and pragmatics: The case of EVEN IF. In Noveck, I. & Sperber, D. (Eds.) Towards Experimental Pragmatics (pp. 228-253). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Evans, J.St.B.T. & Feeney, A. (2004). Belief structures and reasoning. In Sternberg, R.J. & Leighton, J. (Eds.) The Nature of Reasoning (pp. 78-102). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Feeney, A., Scrafton, S., Duckworth, A. & Handley, S.J. (2004). The story of some: Everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 90-101.

Feeney, A., Handley, S.J. & Kentridge, R. (2003). Deciding between accounts of the selection task: A reply to Oaksford. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 1079-1088.

Evans, J.St.B.T., Venn, S., & Feeney, A. (2002). Implicit and explicit processes in hypothesis testing task. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 31-46.

Handley, S.J., Feeney, A., & Harper, C. (2002). Alternative antecedents, probabilities, and the suppression of fallacies in Wason's selection task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 799-818.

Feeney, A. (2000). Simple heuristics: From one infinite regress to another? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 749-750.

Feeney, A., Evans, J.St.B.T., & Clibbens, J. (2000). Background beliefs and evidence interpretation. Thinking and Reasoning, 6, 97-124.

Feeney, A., & Handley, S.J. (2000). The suppression of q-card selections: Evidence for deductive inference in Wason's selection task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 1224-1242.

Handley, S., & Feeney, A. (2000). Deduction in the selection task. Psycoloquy, 11,

Refereed Conference Proceedings and Book Reviews

Bonnefon, J. F., De Neys, W., & Feeney, A. (2011). Processing scalar inferences in face-threatening contexts. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Crisp-Bright, A.K. & Feeney, A. (2010). The effects of domain and type of knowledge on category-based induction. In Camtrabone, R. & Ohlsson, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Feeney, A. & Heit, E. (2010). Does all thinking involve the same different processes? Review of Evans, J.St.B.T. Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgement. American Journal of Psychology, 123, 121-124.

Scrafton, S. & Feeney, A. (2006). Dual processes, development, and scalar implicature. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 774-779. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Wilburn, C.J. & Feeney, A. (2006). Induction in children and adults. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 888-893. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Feeney, A. (2004). Review of Sedlmeier, P. & Betsch, T. (Eds.). Etc. frequency processing and cognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 183-185.

Feeney, A., Adams, J., Webber, L. & Ewbank, M. (2004). Individual differences in graphical reasoning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2980, 271-285.

Feeney, A. & Webber, L.J. (2003) Analogical representation and graph comprehension. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2733, 212-221.

Webber, L.J. & Feeney, A. (2003) How people represent and reason from graphs. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1206-1211. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Feeney, A., & Gardiner, D.R. (2002). Category size and category-based induction. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 292-297. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Feeney, A., & Handley, S.J. (2001). Testing hypotheses about mechanical devices. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 273-278. Mahwah, NJ: LEA

Feeney, A., Evans, J.St.B.T., & Venn, S. (2000). A rarity heuristic for hypothesis testing. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 119-124. Mahwah, NJ: LEA

Feeney, A., Hola, A.K.W., Liversedge, S.P., Findlay, J.M., & Metcalf, R. (2000). How people extract information from graphs: Evidence from a sentence-graph verification paradigm. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1889, 149-161.

Feeney, A., & Handley, S. (1998). The suppression of card selections in Wason's selection task: Evidence that inference plays a role. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 339-344. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Feeney, A., Evans, J.St.B.T., & Clibbens, J. (1997). Probabilities, utilities and hypothesis testing. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 217-222. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.