Skip to Content
Skip to main content
LOGO(small) - Queen's University Belfast
  • Our twitter
  • Our facebook
  • Our linkedin
  • Our youtube
SEARCH SEARCH
LOGO(large) - Queen's University Belfast

The Institute For Global Food Security

  • Home
  • Research
    • Case Studies
    • Research Impact
    • Farms of the Future
    • Food, Nutrition and Health
    • Global Food Integrity
  • Study
  • Partnerships (including EIT Food)
  • Contact
    • Researchers and PhD supervisors
    • Key Contacts
    • Office Staff
    • Technical Staff
  • News
    • Covid-19 and Food podcast
  • Facilities (including ASSET lab)
  • Events
    • ASSET 2022
    • Previous Events
  • Media
  • Home
  • Research
    • Case Studies
    • Research Impact
    • Farms of the Future
    • Food, Nutrition and Health
    • Global Food Integrity
  • Study
  • Partnerships (including EIT Food)
  • Contact
    • Researchers and PhD supervisors
    • Key Contacts
    • Office Staff
    • Technical Staff
  • News
    • Covid-19 and Food podcast
  • Facilities (including ASSET lab)
  • Events
    • ASSET 2022
    • Previous Events
  • Media
  • Our twitter
  • Our facebook
  • Our linkedin
  • Home
  • The Institute for Global Food Security
  • News

News

New evidence shows noise pollution is hampering birds communicating with each other

20 June, 2019

Noise pollution is making it difficult for birds to communicate with each other and it could lead to a severe decline in numbers, new research from IGFS has found.

In Spring, birds use song to show aggressiveness and to attain territory for nesting and breeding, but this is becoming tougher due to noisy conditions created by humans.

Dr Gareth Arnott, Senior Lecturer and Researcher from IGFS, studied bird song in detail and found that background noise can mask crucial information.

The findings have been published in Biology Letters.

Dr Arnott explains: “Sound is a great form of bird communication because it can carry beyond where birds can see.

“Singing is one of the most common ways birds advertise that a territory belongs to them, and birds will perch near the edge of their territory to broadcast their claim to the maximum range. A strong, vibrant song will help defend a territory from intruders and attract a mate.”

However, Dr Arnott and his team have discovered man-made noise is disrupting them from being able to hear and understand each other clearly.

Dr Gareth Arnott continues: “We found that bird song structure can communicate aggressive intent, enabling birds to assess their opponent, but human-made noise can disrupt this crucial information passed between them by masking the complexity of their songs used for acquiring resources, such as territory and space for nesting.

“As a result, the birds receive incomplete information on their opponent's intent and do not appropriately adjust their response.”

In the experiment, the team used playbacks of robin song to stimulate responses from birds who were territory holders. These were simple or complex songs in either the presence or absence of noise. Behavioural and vocal responses of territory holders to the playbacks were then recorded for analysis. The researchers found that song complexity was used as a signal of aggressive intent, with birds demonstrating higher aggressive intent towards complex versus simple song, reflecting the level of threat perceived by the signal. However, importantly, this assessment process was disrupted by the presence of noise.

The findings raise concerns about the ability of birds to compete for resources under the growing extent of noise from human activities. The study also shows that bird song is crucial to the survival and reproduction of birds and there are important implications to consider around noise pollution and the protection of wildlife.

Dr Arnott adds: "The study is evidence that human-made noise pollution impacts animal habitats and directly influences their ability to communicate properly, which may have implications for survival and population numbers for birds.

“This must be further investigated in order to protect our valued biodiversity.”

The research was funded by Queen’s as part of its Masters in Science Zoology programme, pursued as a research thesis by James Wilson, and supported by Queen’s researchers Dr Kyriacos Kareklas, Dr Hansjoerg Kunc and Dr Gareth Arnott.


Share
Latest News
  • Cleaning up the murky waters of rice fraud
    1 March, 2021
  • New research method reveals significant reduction in carbon footprint of British pig farms     
    24 February, 2021
  • Children as young as two can learn to cook
    28 January, 2021
  • Mass spectrometry to be used to develop test for bovine mastitis and potentially reduce AMR
    21 January, 2021
  • How we cook changed during lockdown – and we can learn from this for life after the pandemic
    6 January, 2021
In This Section
News
  • Covid-19 and Food podcast
Queen's University Belfast - Logo (small)
Contact Us

Institute for Global Food Security
Biological Sciences Building
19 Chlorine Gardens, Belfast
BT9 5DL

Email: IGFS@qub.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)28 9097 6514

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Partnerships

 

© Queen's University Belfast 2021
Privacy and cookies
Website accessibility
Freedom of information
Modern slavery statement
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion