• carry out time-limited reflection upon research projects/tasks
• express in fluent and appropriate written terms the results of research
• express in fluent and appropriate oral terms the results of research
• respond quickly to alternate views and challenges to propositions made in research
• set time-tables and targets for research- and project management
• engage with theoretical models of interpretation
• comprehend complex ideas
• be self-reflective;
• exercise sound, reasoned judgment;
• think independently, originally and in a constructively critical manner;
• appreciate a variety of philosophical and theological perspectives on academic enquiry;
• synthesise diverse primary evidence and subsequent academic comment;
• assess and appraise differing views on significant areas of academic debate;
• discriminate between what is central and what is peripheral to the issue in question;
• evaluate sources critically in their context;
• make judgments on the basis of varied and problematic evidence and according to the persuasiveness of the arguments or the reliability of the evidence used.
• gather, organise and deploy evidence, data and information from a variety of secondary and some primary sources, so as to formulate and support a line of reasoning, or argument;
• identify, investigate, analyse, formulate and advocate solutions to problems;
• synthesise relevant information and exercise critical judgement, primarily through essay writing;
• manage their own learning self critically;
• recognise the importance of explicit referencing and the ethical requirements of study, which requires critical and reflective use of information and information technology in the learning process;

Teaching/Learning Methods and Strategies

Teaching/Learning Methods used on the Theology and Philosophy pathway foster cognitive skills in the following ways:
Lectures and tutorials together provide the opportunity to discuss, evaluate and subject-specific knowledge
• They also expose students to specific contextual and theoretical information as well as offering practical examples of different critical approaches.
• Seminars offer a variety of tutor-led and student-led learning opportunities as well as a more sustained opportunity to debate and evaluate a breadth of knowledge gained independently from directed reading and from the sharing of resources and information.
• Group presentations are used to encourage students to pursue their own interests, collaborate with peers, negotiate the demands of teamwork and develop their understanding of a topic.
• Dissertation work is a programme of independent study agreed between student and supervisor designed to test the student’s capacity to manage independent study
• Through class discussions, students develop a comparative understanding of different approaches to material and the ability to formulate their own arguments and responses.
• Class presentations and student interaction in small group sessions (e.g. tutorials or seminars) develop communication and rhetorical skills.
• Student-centred learning situations encourage the ability to present and summarise knowledge to peers in a coherent, structured form, and to enhance further organisational and inter-personal skills.
• Writing skills tutorials and lectures develop essay-writing on stylistic, structural, rhetorical and bibliographical levels. The ability to collate and obtain information is developed through introductory training in the use of libraries and online resources.

Methods of Assessment

Assessments required of students on the Theology and Philosophy pathway test and develop capacity to demonstrate the following cognitive skills:
• To undertake time-limited reflection upon research projects/tasks
• To express in fluent and appropriate written terms the results of research
• To respond promptly to alternate views and challenges to propositions made in research
• To set time-tables and targets for research- and project management
• To engage with theoretical models of interpretation
• To comprehend complex ideas
• To be self-reflective;
• To exercise sound, reasoned judgment;
• To think independently, originally and in a constructively critical manner;
• To appreciate a variety of textual and cultural perspectives on academic enquiry;
• To synthesise diverse primary evidence and subsequent academic comment;
• To assess and appraise differing views on significant areas of academic debate;
• To discriminate between what is central and what is peripheral to the issue in question;
• To evaluate sources and academic comment critically in their context;
• To make judgments on the basis of varied and problematic evidence and according to the persuasiveness of the arguments or the reliability of the evidence used.
• To gather, organise and deploy evidence, data and information from a variety of secondary and some primary sources, so as to formulate and support a line of reasoning, or argument;
• To appreciate the importance of and comply with the ethical requirements of study, which requires critical and reflective use of information and information technology in the learning process

Demonstrate an interrelated knowledge and understanding of each discipline.

In Theology, students will have acquired the ability to:
• undertake exegetical exploration and analysis of canonical Biblical texts,
• reconstruct the context of the production of ideas and evaluate their influence on society at different historical periods as well as in the contemporary world.
• Appreciate the ways in which theological thinking informs pastoral work and mission

By taking Philosophy and Theology modules together, students will have developed an understanding of the key concepts that are used to undertake philosophical analysis and pursue theological study.

In Philosophy, students will have:
• acquired knowledge and understanding of a range of philosophical subjects as well as numerous approaches, methods and theories which are employed to understand philosophical ideas and their contexts;
• developed an understanding of the key concepts that are used to undertake philosophical reflection and analysis
• explored major themes in the history of philosophy.

Teaching/Learning Methods and Strategies

Teaching and learning strategies used on the programme will have established:
• a knowledge of the core subject knowledge base for the academic study of Theology and Philosophy respectively

• an awareness of the most influential ideas shaping the academic discourse in each

• an understanding of how academic enquiry is conducted in each

• an understanding of academic dialectics

• an aptitude for researching, promoting and publishing ideas in an academic context

Methods of Assessment

Assessment methods used on the programme will have achieved the Knowledge and Understanding outcomes by requiring students to demonstrate:

• Analytical and critical knowledge of the key theological and philosophical texts relevant to the disciplines as currently conceived
• significant engagement with influential contemporary and historical thinking on the subjects
• discipline-specific analytical techniques (exegesis, literary-critical analysis, historical analysis, comprehension of theoretical and methodological practice; philosophical speculation and enquiry in pursuit of scholarly objectives, theoretical rigour)
• clear, concise and informed presentation of ideas
• aptitude for academic debate and discussion in both written- and oral form

As discrete disciplines, Theology and Philosophy each seek to promote their own unique subject skills through developing students’ capacity to understand and reflect upon the nature of the different disciplines.

Many subject-specific skills are complementary and mutually reinforcing, and students should develop the ability to research, gather, sift and deploy relevant information and concepts, discriminating between what is central and what is peripheral to the issue in question; to evaluate sources critically in their context; and to make judgments on the basis of varied and problematic evidence.

Students should also be able to understand, discriminate between, and evaluate critically conflicting theoretical and interpretative positions, and form a judgment on their validity according to the persuasiveness of the arguments and the reliability of the evidence used.

Philosophy is concerned with key debates within the field of philosophical enquiry: theories of knowledge, ethics and meaning.

More specifically, students on the Joint Honours Degree will acquire the ability to:

• read philosophical and theological texts with a developed awareness and appreciation of their formal, structural, stylistic, and culturally specific properties;
• bring knowledge to bear on critical interpretation of the ways in which different cultural and historical contexts inform the reading and writing of texts, as well as subsequent theological interpretations;
• analyse the forms, function, and development of philosophical and theological language;
• conduct critical debate, drawing on and engaging with different critical perspectives in the analysis of texts;
• be aware of key debates concerning the development of the disciplines of philosophy and theology;
• write coherent, structured and intellectually rigorous essays in answer to specific questions on scholarly philosophical and theological literature;
• comprehend and highlight key primary texts as a fundamental feature of academic debate, engaging with influential modern critical analysis;
• develop the key skills of academic presentation of work: fluency of expression, citation protocols and bibliographical conventions

Teaching/Learning Methods and Strategies

Teaching and learning strategies used on the programme will have established:
• a substantial familiarity with the core knowledge base for the academic study of Philosophy and Theology respectively

• an awareness of the most influential ideas shaping the academic discourse in each

• an understanding of how academic enquiry is conducted in each

• an understanding of academic dialectics

• an aptitude for researching, promoting and publishing ideas in an academic context both written and orally

Methods of Assessment

The assessment regime on the programme is comprised of by a variety of traditional and innovative methods, including timed unseen written examinations, data analysis, essays, critical book/article reviews, portfolios, individual and group presentations, and seminar and tutorial reports and contributions. These vary in accordance with the specific learning outcomes of particular modules as set out in the individual module descriptions. Formative written work assists the development of understanding, critical judgment, and independent thought, both through the feedback given, and through the process of writing itself. Analytical, discursive, interpretive and critical exercises – both formative and summative – test students’ ability to engage with, analyse, contextualise, interpret and criticise relevant material.

All these assessment methods require students to demonstrate the subject skills which are detailed in each School’s criteria for marking undergraduate work. While these teaching and assessment methods deliver information to students and test their knowledge of that information in each subject, students are encouraged to assimilate and apply knowledge of both disciplines discretely to become independent, self-reflective learners. Module guides and BA Handbooks inform students in their choice of, access to, and citation of relevant secondary materials.

The different methods of assessment serve different, but complementary, purposes:

• Examinations and essays require that students demonstrate coverage of material, appropriate methods of analysis, the ability to discriminate between arguments, and the ability to form an independent argument.
• Written exams help students gain a knowledge of a topic that can be readily and directly applied to a set problem or question, and also test their ability to select relevant information and to write clearly and concisely within a set time.
• Group presentations are used to encourage students to pursue their own interests and develop their understanding of a topic.
• Extended essays test their ability to order and shape information, and to recognise ways in which to present and prioritise material.

• Coursework is required to be submitted in a specified form and to fixed deadlines, thus teaching students to learn to prioritise assignments and objectives and to hone their organisational and time-management skills.

Feedback is provided for each type and instance of assessment and students may seek dedicated feedback sessions with course tutors.

From each discipline, students will acquire a repertoire of skills which are transferable to each other as well as other areas of endeavour and enterprise, including in their future careers, specifically the ability to:

• work under time-pressure and to deadlines;
• digest material from various sources;
• evaluate and judge evidence and the quality of information
• present high-quality analysis cogently and succinctly;
• make oral and group presentations using appropriate skills;
• understand the role and use of feedback in assessing and improving performance;
• reflect on intellectual and professional priorities;
• collate and process information from an array of sources, including electronic media;
• use their knowledge in cogent, communicable ways to present arguments and clarify complex issues in both oral and written forms;
• present ideas and arguments orally in both formal and informal contexts;
• work effectively both independently and in a team setting;
• manage time efficiently;
• respond constructively to criticism;
• take notes and summarise accurately and effectively;
• use libraries and online resources;
• use IT skills (word processing, use of internet resources);
• communicate and interact effectively;
• show self-reliance, initiative, adaptability and flexibility.

Teaching/Learning Methods and Strategies

Lectures and tutorials expose students to the tasks of:
• comprehending and evaluating new and complex information within a time-limited context
• observing the techniques of expert analysis and presentation of research data

• Seminars:offer a variety of tutor- and student-led learning opportunities as well as a more sustained opportunity to debate and evaluate a breadth of knowledge gained independently from directed reading and from the sharing of resources and information.

• Group presentations:encourage students to pursue their own interests, collaborate with peers, negotiate the demands of teamwork and develop their understanding of a topic.

• Dissertations: Test the capacity of students to undertake a programme of independent study agreed between student and supervisor

• Class discussions: Allow students to develop a comparative understanding of different approaches to material and the ability to formulate their own arguments and responses.

• Class presentations:Encourage student interaction in small group sessions (e.g. tutorials or seminars) and develop communication and rhetorical skills.

• Student-centred learning situations: encourage the ability of students to present and summarise knowledge to peers in a coherent, structured form, and to enhance further organisational and inter-personal skills.

• Writing skills tutorials and lectures: develop essay-writing on stylistic, structural, rhetorical and bibliographical levels. The ability to collate and obtain information is enhanced by introductory training in the use of libraries and online resources.

Methods of Assessment

Methods of assessment on the programme establish and refine key transferable skills:

• Written examinations:
• Ask of students high-level skills of thorough familiarisation with specific subjects
• Time-limited exposition of analysis of specific subjects
• Swift structuring and presentation of ideas
• Distillation of essentials and exclusion of information of marginal importance


• Seminars require: Interaction with subject experts and peers in analysing subjects, themes and ideas within a group or team context


• Group presentations: encourage students to collaborate with peers and negotiate the demands of teamwork.

• Dissertations: Test the capacity of students to take ownership of independent study projects
• They demand discipline, maturity and high-level skills of academic organisation

• Journalling: Encourages sustained reflective and evaluative practice