The University’s regulations concerning Boards of Examiners can be found in Regulation 5 of the Study Regulations for Undergraduate Programmes and Regulation 5 of the Study Regulations for Postgraduate Taught Programmes.
This section of the Code of Practice offers guidance for Schools in the application of the University Regulations. In any case of a conflict of interpretation, the Regulations represent the official University position and take precedence.
Note: It is the responsibility of each Head of School to ensure compliance with this Code of Practice. While operational responsibility may be delegated to School staff, the Head of School retains formal accountability for oversight of the School’s processes and procedures.
Subject to procedures and regulations laid down by the Academic Council and Senate, University assessments are conducted under the supervision and control of Boards of Examiners.
The Head of School shall be the Chairperson of the Board of Examiners, except where circumstances dictate that the Head of School delegates this authority to a senior member of academic staff within the School. The Head of School shall appoint a Secretary from the School.
The University operates two tiers of Board: Subject Boards and Programme Boards.
|Subject Board||Programme Board|
|Agrees marks for all modules in that subject.||Receives confirmed marks from subject boards. Has no authority to change marks.|
|Membership is drawn from academic staff teaching the subject.||Membership is drawn from contributing subject boards.|
|Includes subject external examiner.||Includes programme external examiner (drawn from pool of subject external examiners).|
|External examiner attendance is encouraged but not required.||External examiner attendance is required.|
Where appropriate, the Subject and Programme Boards may be combined into one single Board.
A pre-board meeting may be held if required. In a pre-board meeting, the Chair and Secretary of the Board of Examiners meet informally to review marks in advance of a formal board meeting. The pre-board meeting offers an opportunity to determine if there are particular issues which the Board may need to prioritise. A pre-board meeting has no authority to confirm marks or to make decisions on student progress.
The Head of School shall be responsible for ensuring that a Subject Board of Examiners is established for each subject taught by the School or in conjunction with a collaborative partner. The members shall be drawn from the academic staff teaching the subject.
The Subject Board(s) shall agree marks for all modules in that subject. Boards shall include within their membership the external examiner(s) appointed by the Education Committee on behalf of Academic Council for that subject.
Subject Boards are responsible only for marks or grades in the modules in a given subject in a given semester or year (as appropriate). A Subject Board does not review a student’s marks or grades in other subjects or in other semesters/years.
The attendance of the Subject External Examiner at the Subject Board of Examiners meeting is encouraged but not required. In instances where the Subject External Examiner does not attend, the School must ensure that the external examiner has contributed fully to the moderation process, has provided comments to the Board, and has approved the final list of marks. In the exceptional circumstances where an external examiner feels unable to approve the final list of marks, this should be noted by the Secretary to the Board, and urgently communicated to the Director of Academic and Student Affairs and the Pro-Vice-Chancellor Education and Students.
Where an external examiner is a member of a Subject Board, but is not required to be present at the meeting of that Board, the Chair of the Board of Examiners must ensure that the external examiner is fully consulted by other means, and that they see samples of work. The Chair of the Board of Examiners is responsible in such cases for ensuring that the external examiner’s views are presented to the Board.
Subject Boards are responsible for applying Study Regulations for Undergraduate Programmes 1.3.2 to 1.3.6 and/or Study Regulations for Postgraduate Taught Programmes 1.2.3 to 1.2.7. Worked examples of these regulations are provided in the table below.
|Student||Assessment 1 (50%)||Assessment 2 (50%)||Module Mark||Module Outcome||Assessment 1 Resit||Assessment 2 Resit||Resit Outcome||Relevant UG Regulation|
The Head of School shall be responsible for ensuring that a Programme Board of Examiners is established to deal with every programme offered by the School. If a programme involves more than one School, the Heads of School shall decide which one of them shall have overall responsibility for the Programme Board.
Programme Boards receive confirmed marks from Subject Boards, and must not change marks. On the basis of the marks received, Programme Boards make decisions on progression and award for each student. Programme Boards must take into consideration any recommendations made by an Exceptional Circumstances Committee, but must not discuss the exceptional circumstances of individual students.
The Programme Board shall consist of one or more representative(s) from each Subject Board contributing to the Programme. For Programmes involving more than one Subject, the Chairperson and Secretary shall be agreed by the relevant Heads of School. The Programme Board shall include the Programme External Examiner, who will normally also be a Subject External Examiner from one of the relevant Subject Boards. The attendance of the Programme External Examiner at the Programme Board of Examiners meeting is compulsory.
In the exceptional circumstances where an external examiner feels unable to approve the progression and award decisions of a Programme Board, this should be noted by the Secretary to the Board, and urgently communicated to the Director of Academic and Student Affairs and the Pro-Vice Chancellor Education and Students.
Not all external examiners will be members of both Subject and Programme Boards of Examiners. The Secretary of the Programme Board of Examiners should forward a summary of the final classifications agreed by the Programme Board to those examiners who sit on Subject Boards only, for their information.
In the interests of consistency of decision-making, Schools may wish to consider scheduling Programme Boards of Examiners which consider more than one programme, if practical.
Internal examiners are drawn from the academic staff teaching the subject. Internal examiners shall be appointed by the School on behalf of the Education Committee.
External examiners shall be appointed by the Education Committee on behalf of the Academic Council. The nominations must be submitted by the School on the external examiner nomination form. The Head of School must sign the standard external examiner nomination form before it will be accepted by the Education Committee.
External examiners shall normally be appointed for a term of four years. Except in cases where external examiners indicate that they cannot complete their terms of office, a Board may not propose the replacement of external examiners before their terms of office have expired without the permission of the Director of Academic and Student Affairs.
External examiners who retire from employment during their term of office can continue until the end of their period of appointment. Appointment will not normally extend beyond three years after retirement.
A person who has completed service as an external examiner may not normally be re-appointed as an external examiner until five years have elapsed since the end of their period of service.
Former members of staff may not be appointed as external examiners until five years have elapsed since the termination of their appointment at Queen’s.
Where internal examiners leave the University before the examinations for which they were appointed take place, they may be appointed as special internal examiners in addition to the normal internal and external examiners.
Where an examiner has a link with a student which might influence the examiner's judgement, the examiner shall inform the Chairperson of the Board of Examiners, who shall decide whether the examiner shall be involved in the assessment of that student. This should be reported to the Director of Academic and Student Affairs.
The Chairperson of the Board of Examiners shall be responsible to the Director of Academic and Student Affairs for ensuring that the approved procedures and regulations are followed by the Board and that the correct marks are published by the School.
The Secretary of the Board shall be responsible for keeping a record of all decisions and the reasoning behind them, and for ensuring that the minutes are retained in line with the School’s records management policy.
The Head of School must ensure that the relevant external examiners are consulted about proposed meetings of Boards of Examiners, and that the dates are confirmed as early as possible.
Programme external examiners must attend the Board of Examiners’ meeting at the end of the second semester. Programme or Subject external examiners may attend at the end of the first semester in year one of their term of office, where appropriate, but should not normally attend at the end of the first semester in subsequent years.
In cases where external examiners are not present, they must be fully consulted by post, telephone or other means such as fax, videoconferencing, e-mail etc. It shall be the responsibility of the Chairperson of the Board of Examiners to ensure that the views of the other external examiners are presented to the Board.
If the opinion of a Board is equally divided, the Chairperson of the Board shall have the final casting vote (in addition to the Chairperson’s original vote as a member of the Board of Examiners). In all other cases, it will be the majority decision of the members present of the Board of Examiners that will be upheld.
Students may receive provisional marks following internal moderation and before external moderation. Students must be made aware that provisional marks may increase or decrease because of external moderation and ratification at a Subject Board. Marks that are published following a Subject Board may not be changed unless an error is subsequently identified.
The Secretary of the Board is responsible for keeping formal minutes which record all the Board’s decisions and the reasoning behind them, and for ensuring that the minutes are retained in line with the School’s records management policy. The Director of Academic and Student Affairs may undertake periodic audit sampling of the minutes of Boards of Examiners Meetings. Schools should therefore be aware that Academic Affairs may request copies of the minutes for specific meetings of Boards of Examiners.
A template for minutes is maintained by Academic Affairs and distributed to Schools.
It should be noted that although examination scripts are exempt from disclosure under the Data Protection Act 2018, this exemption does not extend to examiners’ comments, minutes of Boards of Examiners meetings, or minutes of exceptional circumstances committee meetings. It is important that accurate records, at an appropriate level of detail, are kept of the consideration of exceptional circumstances, and of decisions made by Boards of Examiners.
Each School should convene at least one School Exceptional Circumstances Committee to meet prior to the Board of Examiners to consider evidence of exceptional circumstances and make recommendations to the appropriate Board of Examiners. For further details, see the Exceptional Circumstances section of the Code of Practice on Examinations and Assessment.
Queen's University Belfast is committed to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion.
For more information please read our Equality and Diversity Policy.
Queen's University Belfast is registered with the Charity Commission for Northern Ireland NIC101788
VAT registration number: GB 254 7995 11